Jan Ullrich
Ullrich with his five 2nd places in the Tour de France has been compared with the “eternal second” Raymond Poulidor, but I don’t think this is a good comparison. Poulidor came in 2nd at the Tour three times and five times came in the 3rd spot. He never wore the yellow jersey even for one day. He also came in 2nd once at the World Championship. He did win the Vuelta once though and several classics as well. “Pou Pou” as he was affectionately called in France was beloved because of all his 2nd places and he was a good contrast to the too smooth Anquetil. Much like with the Chicago Cubs baseball team it is always popular to root for the underdog.
While their list of wins is similar between Poulidor and Ullrich they are not the same. Ullrich did win the Tour and after his win in ’98 many people (including me) thought this would be the guy to win the Tour more then 5 times. With his weight problems in many years, the drug incident, and others it makes you question his commitment. So while Poulidor was viewed as an overachiever that got stuck competing against naturally superior athletes of Anquetil and Merckx; while Ullrich is viewed as very gifted athlete that has the bad luck of going against Lance, but perhaps has underachieved as well. It is hard for the public to love you if they think you are wasting some great talent.
The next 2 years are critical on how Ullrich will be remembered in cycling history. If he wins the Tour at least once then he will be remembered as a great athlete that had the misfortune of racing as the same time as Lance. If he doesn’t then he will be remembered as an underachiever who could have won more. Ullrich like Lance has put all his eggs in the Tour basket and since that one race is what he focuses on then that is how he should be expected to be judged.